Understanding the Complexity behind Stablecoin Transactions
In today’s fast-paced digital world, the way we handle money is constantly evolving. One such evolution is the emergence of stablecoins, a form of digital currency designed to maintain a stable value. Now, there’s a buzz suggesting that stablecoins might soon surpass traditional payment giants like Visa in terms of the total volume of transactions. But Visa’s crypto boss isn’t so sure.
So, is this just speculation, or could stablecoins truly disrupt the established order of the payments industry? Let’s get into this intriguing possibility and explore what it could mean for the future of digital payments.
Why Stablecoins Might Win
Some experts think stablecoins are perfect for moving money across borders. They say they’re super easy to use, fast, and cheap. Stablecoins are available all the time, transactions happen quickly (in minutes!), and fees are tiny compared to traditional ways of paying. Plus, big banks are starting to use stablecoins, too, showing they trust them for moving money around.
The Data Doesn’t Tell the Full Story
While the idea of stablecoins overtaking Visa in transaction volume is tantalizing, a closer examination of the data reveals a more complex picture. Visa’s skepticism towards stablecoins stems from its analysis of transaction data, which raises doubts about the authenticity of the reported volumes.
According to Visa’s dashboard, as much as 90% of stablecoin transactions in the past month may not have been initiated by real users. Instead, they appear to be the result of automated processes, such as bots or programs, engaging in transactions. This discrepancy between reported and genuine transaction volumes casts doubt on the accuracy of the data and calls into question the true extent of stablecoin usage.
To address this issue, Visa has collaborated with Allium Labs to develop an adjusted metric for measuring stablecoin transactions. This metric aims to filter out potentially distorted data arising from inorganic activity and artificial inflationary practices. By applying filters such as a single directional volume filter and an inorganic user filter, Visa seeks to provide a more accurate representation of genuine stablecoin transactions.
Despite these efforts, the underlying question remains: how much of the reported stablecoin transaction volume reflects genuine user activity, and how much is inflated by automated processes? The answer to this question is crucial in understanding the true impact of stablecoins on the payment landscape and assessing their potential to challenge traditional payment networks like Visa.Top of Form
Changes in How We Pay
While we’re talking about all this, big companies are making moves too. PayPal made its own stablecoin, and Stripe, a platform for online payments, said they’d start accepting stablecoins. Even Ripple, a big player in crypto, wants in on the action with its own stablecoin. The world of payments is changing fast, and stablecoins are a big part of it.
As things change, it’s smart to stay informed. If you’re interested in investing in digital money, consider talking to digital asset specialists at Kenson Investments. We help clients learn about digital currencies in-depth.
Feel free to reach out to us today.
Disclaimer: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Crypto currency assets involve inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct thorough research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.
“The crypto currency and digital asset space is an emerging asset class that has not yet been regulated by the SEC and US Federal Government. None of the information provided by Kenson LLC should be considered as financial investment advice. Please consult your Registered Financial Advisor for guidance. Kenson LLC does not offer any products regulated by the SEC including, equities, registered securities, ETFs, stocks, bonds, or equivalents”
